Subject: [boost] [TypeErasure]_self
From: Markus Werle (numerical.simulation_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-07-22 11:27:17
Hi Steven,
In
[docs]/type_erasure/libs/type_erasure/doc/html/boost_typeerasure/feedback.html
you ask for feedback:
I would be perfectly happy with _ instead of _self.
You would be in sync with the folks that wrote C# Reactive Extensions
(http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/data/gg577611)
who have the convention that _ stands for "unused", which it is here, too.
To me
constructible<_(const std::string&)>
reads fine.
Markus