Subject: Re: [boost] Boost and exceptions
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-22 16:40:19
Dave Abrahams wrote:
> on Fri Jun 22 2012, Daniel James <dnljms-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
>> There are a lot of headers violating your rule.
>
> Most notably, there are plenty of aggregate headers that do this.
In a previous post, I specifically excluded "convenience headers" from
being considered as "violating" this "rule". They are not at issue here.
Robert Ramey