Subject: Re: [boost] [git/modularization] Suggested names for branches?
From: Brian Schrom (brian.schrom_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-06-04 12:27:39
On 06/04/2012 09:14 AM, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> That would be more conventional. It's an open question whether we're
> better off changing to the names that are the defaults (and
> documented) by git-flow, or we're better off choosing names that
> non-git-flow-ers will more easily recognize.
As a new user to a technology, it is sure nice when the defaults do the
right thing out of the box without having to consult detailed documentation.