Boost mailing page: Re: [boost] Interest in double-ended priority queue? (priority

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in double-ended priority queue? (priority_deque)
From: Joel (jdy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-05-31 12:14:35

Next message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [review] Multiprecision review scheduled for June 8th - 17th, 2012"
Previous message: Robert Ramey: "Re: [boost] Is there interest in copyable type_info that does notrequire RTTI (was: Is there interest in typeid(TYPE).name()like function that does not require RTTI)"
In reply to: Nathaniel McClatchey: "[boost] Interest in double-ended priority queue? (priority_deque)"
Next in thread: Nathaniel McClatchey: "Re: [boost] Interest in double-ended priority queue? (priority_deque)"
Reply: Nathaniel McClatchey: "Re: [boost] Interest in double-ended priority queue? (priority_deque)"

Nathaniel McClatchey <njmcclatchey1990 <at> pointloma.edu> writes:

Sounds interesting to me. Good contribution to boost::container. Is it ready
to work with interprocess?

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view