Subject: Re: [boost] [Variant] C++11 variadic template implementation
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-04-15 10:02:06
On 15/04/12 15:02, paul Fultz wrote:
> Well you can expand the parameter pack to create a static array of
> function pointers.
I see, interesting.
How does it fare in terms of bloat and performance? Are compilers still
able to inline with this?