Subject: Re: [boost] Metaprogram benchmarks
From: Sumant Tambe (sutambe_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-04-03 15:28:01
Some compile-time computations can be better (faster) implemented as
recursive constexpr functions. I would like to see some performance
comparisons between constexpr and vanilla metaprogramming.
Sumant
On 3 April 2012 10:56, Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> In order to measure the compile-time efficiency of various C++11
> metaprogramming techniques, I'd like to put together a set of
> benchmarks, and I wanted to discuss here what kinds of tests might be
> appropriate. Aleksey and I came up with some benchmarks for an appendix
> to http://boostpro.com/mplbook/, but some of those are lost and they're
> all getting a bit crusty. Certainly, I have no confidence that they are
> realistic or useful. If anyone has ideas about this, I'd be very
> glad to hear them.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> --
> Dave Abrahams
> BoostPro Computing
> http://www.boostpro.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://listarchives.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>
--
int main(void)
{
while(1) KeepWorking();
}