Subject: Re: [boost] interprocess with unordered_map
From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-19 17:28:18
El 18/03/2012 21:07, Joel escribió:
>> 2012/3/17 Ion Gaztañaga<igaztanaga<at> gmail.com>:
>>> If we want to achieve direct comparison, Boost.Unordered needs to go
>>> Boost.Intrusive or Boost.Multiindex route, and offer additional search
>>> overloads that can find "equivalent keys":
>
> Olaf van der Spek<ml<at> vdspek.org> writes:
>> That route looks like a good one. Avoiding the need for expensive
>> temps is great.
>
> Perhaps map and flat_map need this as well? Should bugs be filed?
Yes, please. At least in Boost.Container, as those containers are based
on Boost.Intrusive, implementation should be pretty easy.
Best,
Ion