Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.ntree_container (bi_tree, quad_tree, oct_tree, etc ptr containers) Is there any interest in this?
From: pavel (paul.cpprules_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-11 13:28:03
Daniel wrote on Sunday, March 11, 2012 at 0:04:28:
> That's not exactly a generic implementation, nor one that is STL-friendly
> (e.g., no iterators).
you are perfectly right
but i believe that this implementation can be almost trivially
integrated with a generic (read: template) interface
besides, i hardly see a kd tree or an octree as a (associative)
container
-- Pavel P.S. if you notice a grammar mistake or weird phrasing in my message please point it out