Subject: Re: [boost] Determining interest: Pure imaginary number library
From: Matthieu Schaller (matthieu.schaller_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-02-29 07:36:20
Dear all,
A few months ago I proposed to add an imaginary number class to boost in
order to extend the std::complex class and improve performance when
computations involving pure imaginary numbers are involved. Some of you
showed some interest and proposed some possible improvements, the main
one being to actually replace the std::complex class by a boost::complex
and boost::imaginary pair of classes in order for all operations to be
truly symmetric and closer to the mathematical notation.
I have applied these modifications and the code now corresponds to an
extended version of Thorsten Ottosen's n1869 proposal
(http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2005/n1869.html)
The sources and documentation are available here :
http://code.google.com/p/cpp-imaginary-numbers/
They can be retrieved via the SVN repository or downloaded directly as
an archive.
The archive contains the complex.hpp header, a performance test, an
accuracy test and two examples showing the benefits of the imaginary
numbers in "downscaled" real life situations. I have tentatively
embedded everything in the boost::math namespace in order to look for
potential naming conflicts between my code and the existing boost ones.
I would be happy to hear any comment from your side and still hope that
this work is of some interest to you.
Regards,
Matthieu
-- Matthieu Schaller PhD student - Durham University