Subject: Re: [boost] [optional] generates unnessesary code for trivial types
From: paul Fultz (pfultz2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-02-09 10:48:47

• Next message: Topher Cooper: "Re: [boost] [interest] Type Aspects and compile-time constraints"
• Previous message: Steven Samuel Cole: "Re: [boost] [git] neglected aspects"
• In reply to: Domagoj Saric: "Re: [boost] [optional] generates unnessesary code for trivial types"
• Next in thread: Domagoj Saric: "Re: [boost] [optional] generates unnessesary code for trivial types"
• Reply: Domagoj Saric: "Re: [boost] [optional] generates unnessesary code for trivial types"
• Reply: Dave Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [optional] generates unnessesary code for trivial types"

• Next message: Topher Cooper: "Re: [boost] [interest] Type Aspects and compile-time constraints"
• Previous message: Steven Samuel Cole: "Re: [boost] [git] neglected aspects"
• In reply to: Domagoj Saric: "Re: [boost] [optional] generates unnessesary code for trivial types"
• Next in thread: Domagoj Saric: "Re: [boost] [optional] generates unnessesary code for trivial types"
• Reply: Domagoj Saric: "Re: [boost] [optional] generates unnessesary code for trivial types"
• Reply: Dave Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [optional] generates unnessesary code for trivial types"