Boost mailing page: Re: [boost] [geometry] MSVC needs namespace even if it is hoisted

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [geometry] MSVC needs namespace even if it is hoisted
From: Olaf van der Spek (ml_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-12-24 09:32:29

Next message: Matthieu Schaller: "Re: [boost] Determining interest: Pure imaginary number library"
Previous message: Barend Gehrels: "[boost] [geometry] MSVC needs namespace even if it is hoisted"
In reply to: Barend Gehrels: "[boost] [geometry] MSVC needs namespace even if it is hoisted"
Next in thread: Barend Gehrels: "Re: [boost] [geometry] MSVC needs namespace even if it is hoisted"
Reply: Barend Gehrels: "Re: [boost] [geometry] MSVC needs namespace even if it is hoisted"

MSVC what? 6? 10?

Next message: Matthieu Schaller: "Re: [boost] Determining interest: Pure imaginary number library"
Previous message: Barend Gehrels: "[boost] [geometry] MSVC needs namespace even if it is hoisted"
In reply to: Barend Gehrels: "[boost] [geometry] MSVC needs namespace even if it is hoisted"
Next in thread: Barend Gehrels: "Re: [boost] [geometry] MSVC needs namespace even if it is hoisted"
Reply: Barend Gehrels: "Re: [boost] [geometry] MSVC needs namespace even if it is hoisted"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view