Subject: Re: [boost] [chrono] steady_clock efficiency
From: Kenneth Porter (shiva.blacklist_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-30 04:35:59
Vicente Botet <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote in news:1322644051575-
4122296.post_at_[hidden]:
> We could see a little improvement in this case as the conversion could be
> done only once, instead of two. Note the rt_ prefixes in the code (for
> run-time):
Aha, that looks perfect.