Subject: Re: [boost] temp_ptr<> - preventing use as a member
From: Gottlob Frege (gottlobfrege_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-11-17 01:31:45
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Olaf van der Spek <ml_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> This sounds a lot like scoped_ptr.
>
> Sounds more like a ptr that doesn't own it's content...
>
Exactly. And those are bad, right? Unless you know the guarantees
regarding lifetime.
Tony