Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Algorithm design question
From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-10-31 11:41:25
Andrew Sutton wrote:
> > None of this has anything to do with the fact that you want to require
> > operator== to be an equivalence relation, and it doesn't have to be.
>
> Realistically though, when is == not (at least) an equivalence
> relation?
Realistically, and in this context, when the two sides are not of the same
type.