Subject: Re: [boost] Name and Namespace for Potential Boost ExtendedFloating-Point
From: Christopher Kormanyos (e_float_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-01 16:56:08
Sylvester-Bradley, Gareth wrote:
>> So this is the last call for anyone who can't live with it.
> Since you're still asking... :-)
> My vote goes to the following, already mentioned earlier:
<snip>
> namespace boost
> {
> namespace multiprecision
> {
> class mp_float;
> }
> }
> £0.02, Gareth
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Either way is fine. Some did not like the "mp_" prefix.
I don't care.
It will be either "floating" or "mp_float".
I'll see how it looks on the code and tell y'all which one it is when I'm done with it in a week or two.
Thanks again for all the contributions.
Sincerely, Chris.