Subject: Re: [boost] Name and Namespace for Potential Boost Extended Floating-Point
From: Matthias Schabel (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-08-31 18:00:59
>> mp_float
>> mp_int
>> mp_rational
>
> +1
If this is going to be in the "multiprecision" namespace, isn't "mp_*" redundant? Why not just
multiprecision::float
multiprecision::int
multiprecision::rational
$0.02