Subject: Re: [boost] [conversion] review
From: Christian Henning (chhenning_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-08-29 19:01:13
Hi there,
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba
<vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Le 30/08/11 00:09, Phil Endecott a écrit :
>>
>> Gordon Woodhull wrote:
>>>
>>> If I had to write a conversion function, I would rather write it as an
>>> overload of a general-purpose converter, rather than giving it some ugly
>>> typeA2TypeB name.
>>
>> Why is e.g. rgb_to_cmyk() "ugly"?
GIL has such functionality. I like their way of structuring conversion.
Regards,
Christian