Subject: Re: [boost] [interest] underlying type library
From: Nevin Liber (nevin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-08-22 14:31:42
On 22 August 2011 13:06, Vicente J. Botet Escriba
<vicente.botet_at_[hidden]>wrote:
> Note that Movable will imply RawMovable if the default implementation uses
> std::move.
>
That doesn't seem quite right. Don't the move constructor and move
assignment operator have to be noexcept(true) as well for that implication
to hold?
-- Nevin ":-)" Liber <mailto:nevin_at_[hidden]> (847) 691-1404