Subject: Re: [boost] [TTI] Review
From: Gregory Crosswhite (gcross_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-07-18 17:17:12
On 7/18/11 11:43 AM, Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. wrote:
> Actually, now that I take a second look at it, putting TYPE and DEF together
> like this might not solve the naming problem you brought up...
>
> How about
>
> BOOST_TTI_GENERATE_HAS_TYPE
> BOOST_TTI_GENERATE_HAS_TYPE_NAMED
>
> or s/GENERATE/DEFINE/ or s/GENERATE/CREATE/ or...?
Ah, I like GENERATE! It describes exactly what is going on --- i.e.,
that the purpose of the macro is to GENERATE code for HAS_TYPE.
Cheers,
Greg