Subject: Re: [boost] [test] [iostreams] 1.47.0 VC++ 10.0 warnings
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-07-12 06:01:18
On 11 July 2011 18:19, Daniel James <dnljms_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Since iostreams is unmaintained, the easiest solution would be to
> build it with a lower warning level. A handful of warnings are the
> least of its problems.
On second thoughts, it'd probably be better to only include it in the
build if it's explicitly asked for.