Subject: Re: [boost] [1.47.0] [TR1] Regression test failures
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-06-30 16:37:36
On 30 June 2011 17:10, John Maddock <boost.regex_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> There's one minor change to Boost.Math (see below) that fixes a lot of
> these
Looks okay.
> but there are also all sorts of failures caused by changes to the
> Random lib:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/6ga84h4
> http://tinyurl.com/5sml7sz
Should we revert random in release? It seems to have a lot of
problems, or did it always?