Subject: Re: [boost] [1.48.0] Schedule discussion
From: Klaim - Joël Lamotte (mjklaim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-06-26 05:57:09
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 22:18, Lars Viklund <zao_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> If I saw a bump of Boost to 2.x.0, I would expect that something massive
> and somewhat breaking has occurred, along the lines of:
>
> * complete build system revamp, with different build methods and library
> naming convention;
>
> * modularisation of boost libraries into largely standalone components,
> with some infrastructure to roll monolithic and custom releases;
>
> * in essence - Ryppl and the Boost.CMake effort.
>
I always thought that update of all or most of libraries to take account of
some important C++0x features (like adding move semantics where apropriate)
would have it's part in bumping boost to 2.x . Or something related to
C++0x.
Joël Lamotte