Boost mailing page: Re: [boost] Is there interest in an alternative to the Singleton anti-pattern?

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Is there interest in an alternative to the Singleton anti-pattern?
From: Antony Polukhin (antoshkka_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-06-23 03:08:07

Next message: Olaf van der Spek: "Re: [boost] [algorithm] to_lower_copy / to_upper_copy with no output param assumes sequence to be same as input"
Previous message: Matt Chambers: "Re: [boost] Is there interest in an alternative to the Singleton anti-pattern?"
In reply to: Matt Chambers: "Re: [boost] Is there interest in an alternative to the Singleton anti-pattern?"
Next in thread: Ben Robinson: "Re: [boost] Is there interest in an alternative to the Singleton anti-pattern?"

My interest is piqued.

Is your solution thread safe?

Best regards,
Antony Polukhin

Next message: Olaf van der Spek: "Re: [boost] [algorithm] to_lower_copy / to_upper_copy with no output param assumes sequence to be same as input"
Previous message: Matt Chambers: "Re: [boost] Is there interest in an alternative to the Singleton anti-pattern?"
In reply to: Matt Chambers: "Re: [boost] Is there interest in an alternative to the Singleton anti-pattern?"
Next in thread: Ben Robinson: "Re: [boost] Is there interest in an alternative to the Singleton anti-pattern?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view