Subject: Re: [boost] Is there any interest in command line interpreter class templates?
From: Joshua Boyce (raptorfactor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-06-20 22:02:46
One of the primary reasons that I (and others) avoid Boost.ProgramOptions is
that it doesn't 'natively' support wide strings (wide strings are simply
static_cast to narrow strings with no regard to localization or
internationalization). How does this library compare in that respect?