Subject: Re: [boost] [move] new rvalue reference emulation
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-05 10:37:37
At Mon, 4 Apr 2011 22:14:29 -0700,
Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. wrote:
>
> I also forgot to mention that (obviously) this precludes polymorphic return
> types :( At least, I don't see how they can be supported...
Sorry, can you show an example of what's precluded, using C++0x notation?
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com