Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc] Interest in BGL v2?
From: Michael Lopez (mlopez7_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-29 08:46:26
>
>
> I think the original intent of algorithm objects for BGL is inversion of
> control flow: instead of something like BFS calling visitor methods at event
> points, you have a BFS object that suspends itself where it would have
> called the visitor, and then is continued by surrounding code. This makes
> it easier to do things like interleave two BFS runs at the same time, which
> you can't do with the existing model (without threads or coroutines).
>
Exactly. The Origin library provides range-like BFS and DFS. The state of
the algorithm is exposed between each discovery of a vertex. Personally, I
like this approach because it opens up the algorithm to user modifications
while hiding library code.