Subject: Re: [boost] [local] Help for the Alternatives section
From: Thomas Heller (thom.heller_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-27 10:04:32
On Saturday, March 26, 2011 11:19:46 PM Lorenzo Caminiti wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I am updating Boost.Local docs and I could use a some help in getting
> the Alternatives section right
>
http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/sandbox/local/libs/local/doc/html/boost_local/Alternatives.html
I would really like to see the first row removed ...
All alternatives you describe are using C++ syntax ... I know what you mean. But
all the examples use regular C++ syntax.
Another thing what i really wonder is: You write that local classes can not be
passed as a template parameter.
I don't really get the difference between the local class and Boost.Local.
What about this:
int main() {
double sum = 0.0;
int factor = 10;
struct add_impl {
double & sum;
int const& factor;
add_impl(double sum, int factor) : sum(sum), factor(factor) {}
void operator()(double num) const
{
sum += factor * num;
std::clog << "Summed: " << sum << std::endl;
}
};
boost::function<void(double)> add = add_impl(sum, factor);
double nums[3] = {1, 2, 3};
std::for_each(nums, nums + 3, add)
return 0;
}
I would be happy if you sched some light on to why this isn't possible but why
its possible with using your macros.