Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] Boost.Type Traits Extension by Frederic Bron
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-18 12:45:06
On 3/18/2011 12:39 PM, Frédéric Bron wrote:
>> Doesn't this mean, that the naming
>> has_operator_xxx
>> is imprecise and should be
>> operator_xxx_applicable_to
>> or
>> operator_xxx_callable_on
>> instead?
>
> That is the right meaning.
But the wrong name. IMO nobody is going to be comfortable with
'operator_xxx_callable_on' as opposed to 'has_operator_xxx'.