Subject: Re: [boost] GSoC Proposal Preparation For Encoding Awared String
From: Andrew Sutton (asutton.list_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-17 14:36:31
Hi Soares,
> I am an undergraduate student from the National University of
> Singapore and I am interested to take part in this year's GSoC with
> the Boost community.
Welcome!
This is quite possibly the most comprehensive summary of a Boost
discussion by a prospective GSoC student I've ever seen. Be sure to
include this in your proposal as part of the background research (or a
summary thereof).
> I think there are several options that I can choose for my project:
> 1. To use Chad Nelson's code as base, try to incorporate other ideas
> proposed in the mailing list, integrate with Boost.Locale, and make it
> Boost quality to submit for review. If this option is chosen, I wish
> that Chad Nelson can be my mentor.
This seems feasible.
Unfortunately, I don't know if Chad is available or willing to be a mentor.
> 2. To start a new code base, gather and compile ideas suggested in
> mailing list, final design decisions made by me and my mentor but not
> the community (to keep the project going on fast), make it Boost
> quality and submit for review.
I have a feeling that this will be a part of any project that you propose.
> 3. To start the boost::string project, where another better string is
> reinvented and fix all the weaknesses of std::string.
I think that this project may end up being a minefield. Everybody has
their favorite string characteristics and whatever you string you
eventually implement, will eventually fail somebody's requirements :)
> 4. Adopt different proposal, and improve on existing project such as
> Boost.Unicode [2] or Boost.Locale [3] such that it really solves the
> encoding awareness problem.
This also seems feasible.
Was there any consensus on why std::string could or could not be
parameterized with UTF-specific character traits? That seems, on the
surface, like a possible solution. I was following the discussions but
not as closely as others :)
> I hope to get feedback from you on what should I really focus on in
> this project.
Hopefully, one of the participants in those discussions will be able
to provide better feedback than I can.
I think that one thing you should consider in your proposal is how you
actually want to use your library. Consider trying to design your
interface from a user perspective. I think that there is sometimes a
tendency to focus on the technical aspects of a library, and It's easy
to forget the end goal of writing a library: so somebody else can use
it.
Please don't let a lack of communication dissuade you from submitting
a proposal. This list can be high traffic and its easy to miss good
posts.
Best regards,
Andrew Sutton