Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] Boost.Type Traits Extension by Frederic Bron
From: Vicente Botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-16 08:24:33
Joel Falcou-3 wrote:
>
> On 16/03/11 13:11, Stewart, Robert wrote:
>> I generally like the names from Proto. Consistency would be nice, but
>> consider the names as they are likely to be standardized. Better to get
>> the names "right" now. For example, I think "postfix_increment" is a
>> likely name for standardization, while "post_inc" is not.
>
>
> I guess some typedef could be done so we have a consistent proto list of
> operator's name.
>
+1
Vicente
-- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Review-Boost-Type-Traits-Extension-by-Frederic-Bron-tp3353283p3381590.html Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.