Subject: Re: [boost] [chrono] Interoperability with ICL and common concepts
From: Joachim Faulhaber (afojgo_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-15 16:39:25
2011/3/15 Vicente Botet <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]>:
>
> In any case all the added functions should be accessible only if
> BOOST_CHRONO_EXTENSIONS is defined, so semantic compatibility with
> std::chrono is maintained.
Is std::chrono already accepted and frozen in the new standard?