Subject: Re: [boost] Conformance issues in Boost.Icl
From: Doug Gregor (doug.gregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-15 12:08:17
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Joachim Faulhaber
<afojgo_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 2011/3/5 Doug Gregor <doug.gregor_at_[hidden]>:
>>
>> I've been going through the Boost.Icl test failures for Clang, and
>> there are few conformance issues that should be addressed on the Boost
>> side.
>>
>> The main issue is the test fastest_set_icl_set.cpp, which has some
>> declaration-ordering issues with templates that only Clang seems to
>> diagnose (I've verified that Clang is right).
> [...]
>>
>> Big thanks to Joachim for such an excellent compiler test case :)
>
> Hi Doug again,
>
> Big thanks for your excellent error report. Based on it I got my
> includes detangled easily. I fixed the conformance issues and removed
> markups. ICL tests with clang (except for libcxx[0x]-configs) are all
> fine now.
Great!
> Ahh ... it feels good to be in harmony with clang and the standard :-D
>
> ... BTW the German word for harmony is Einklang, which -- many don't
> know this anymore -- has its ancient roots in: To be "one with clang"
> :-}
:)
- Doug