Subject: Re: [boost] [xint] Boost.XInt formal review
From: Scott McMurray (me22.ca+boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-14 19:08:18
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 07:45, Thomas Klimpel
<Thomas.Klimpel_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> OK, that's at least a step forward from "implementation-defined", but the modulo operator ("%") is still awkward to use in practice (for negative numbers).
>
Yes, it's unfortunate that it's generally known as modulo, when it's
really the remainder operator, not modulo at all.
~ Scott