Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review of Proposed Boost.Process library
From: Gordon Woodhull (gordon_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-02-19 17:58:13
Hi Max -
Sounds like you have a competing library? Would you consider merging?
> The Boost.Process must be implemented as a DSEL (probably through the
> Boost.Proto expression templates framework) with a nice (commonly known)
> syntax like:
> ...
> auto pipe = ls [--arg("reverse") % -arg('l') % libs] | grep ["^d"];
I think that's neat but it should be implemented as another layer on top of a functional/OO layer.
Cheers,
Gordon