Subject: Re: [boost] namespace boost?
From: Barend Gehrels (barend_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-19 11:27:42
On 19-1-2011 17:19, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> At Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:58:09 +0800,
> Dean Michael Berris wrote:
>> Although cpp-netlib
>> is there, I'm just not that creative to come up with an alternate name
>> for it. :D
> cpp-net? :-)
For a library not (yet) in boost, cpp-netlib is appropriate.
As soon as it is in boost, Boost.Net?
We had the same thing, ggl (generic geometry library) became
Boost.Geometry because both generic and library were redundant.
Barend