Subject: Re: [boost] [Wiki] Changes in information about gcc warnings.
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-19 08:02:04
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steven Watanabe" <watanabesj_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] [Wiki] Changes in information about gcc warnings.
> AMDG
>
> On 1/12/2011 5:07 PM, Patrick Horgan wrote:
>> *Borland*
>>
>> Information needed here.
>
> At the moment, I think compiler errors
> would matter a lot more than mere warnings.
> Feel free to correct me, but my impression
> from the regression matrix is that support
> for this compiler is practically nil.
+1. Seen the number of librarie sthat don't work with this compiler I don't understand what is the goal to continue running regression test for Borland compiler.
Best,
Vicente