Subject: Re: [boost] namespace boost?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-15 17:30:46
AMDG
On 1/15/2011 2:11 PM, Robert Ramey wrote:
> vicente.botet wrote:
>> You are right, and I forget often to replace this file, but usualy it
>> doesn't changes to much. The ideal will be that this file include a
>> all.hpp file included on the library directory. Other have proposed
>> someting like
>>
>> #include<boost/flyweight/all.hpp>
> or #include<boost/flyweight/include.hpp> for the convenience header.
>
> actually, I might be ok with each library permitting ONE
>
> #include<boost/flyweight.hpp> // convenience header.
I favor this approach because it's already common practice.
I don't consider any of the arguments against it that
I've seen sufficient to justify going to something new.
In Christ,
Steven Watanabe