Subject: Re: [boost] Improving review process
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-13 17:26:32
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 10:29 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] Improving review process
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:49 AM, vicente.botet
> <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> Another case could be that the library depends on another library not yet scheduled.
>
> That's actually no reason to hold up the review. Any dependencies can
> be recoded as implementation details for final submission until
> they're ready to be reviewed on their own.
You are right if the dependency is an implementation detail, not if the dependency appears on the interface.
Vicente