Subject: Re: [boost] Boost and (Microsoft's) _SECURE_SCL
From: Stephan T. Lavavej (stl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-11-03 15:15:44
[John Maddock]
> Is HID=1 SCL=0 ever possible in past versions?
That's the case that I refer to as "the oddball". It can be requested, but it behaves like HID=1 SCL=1 as far as binary compatibility is concerned. They both perform exhaustive correctness checks and trigger debug assertion dialogs. They may differ on what happens if those dialogs are ignored.
STL