Subject: Re: [boost] [function] function wrapping with no exception safetyguarantee
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-10-12 21:38:35
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Peter Dimov <pdimov_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> The issue is not coupling with Boost.Exception, the issue is that the user
> has to supply a definition of boost::throw_exception when exceptions are
> disabled. This was true before there were Boost.Exception.
Okay, and could someone please explain to me what is wrong with that
requirement?
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com