Subject: Re: [boost] Boost Test Policy
From: joel falcou (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-25 01:21:13
On 25/08/10 06:29, Dave Abrahams wrote:
> It always has been. While Boost.Test has some cool features, they
> don't seem to markedly improve the quality of testing in a library
> that uses Boost.Test, which mostly depends on the skill of the test
> designer. Also, if you use lightweight_test.hpp you are liable to
> continue to get useful test results even if Boost.Test should be
> broken ;-)
>
Note that lightweight_test is also useful to run Boost liek UT on embedded
platform where Boost.Test may not be abel to be compiled.