Subject: [boost] Re: [chrono] v0.4.5 Documentation update + warnings removal +›ug fixes
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-13 12:16:35
Hi,
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr." <jhellrung_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2010 5:35 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] [chrono] v0.4.5 Documentation update + warnings removal + bug fixes
>
> On 8/10/2010 11:00 AM, vicente.botet wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have made some minor modifications to the Boost.Chrono library as requested on these mailing lists. The implementaton is stable.
> ...
>> Even if the review's date is not annonced yet, it will be great if some of you make a pre-review, so the conflicting issues are managed before the review.
>
> Is it necessary for common_type to fallback to Boost.TypeOf in the
> absence of decltype? In what situations is (bool ? T : U) not either T,
> U, or some additional const/volatile qualifications on T or U, possibly
> transposed with some reference or pointer qualifiers?
>
> In other words, when does (bool ? T : U) manufacture some new "3rd type"
> out of the blue?
(bool ? T : U) is incorrect as the ?: operator don't works on types but on expression. This is exactle the role of typeof. Are I'm missing something?
Best,
Vicente