Subject: Re: [boost] [boost::endian] Summary of discussion #1
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-06-02 16:56:53
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tomas Puverle" <tomas.puverle_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 9:34 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] [boost::endian] Summary of discussion #1
> By the same reasoning, we should also have a boost::endian_swap<>(), no? (Which
> would be the 'in-place' version)
Are you using the word swap because the bytes are swaped in the implementation?
Vicente