Subject: Re: [boost] Review Wizard Report for May 2010
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-26 17:00:00
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Niebler" <eric_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2010 7:12 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] Review Wizard Report for May 2010
>
> On 5/26/2010 12:36 PM, vicente.botet wrote:
>>> The following libraries have been accepted to Boost, but have not yet
>>> been submitted to SVN:
>>>
>>> * Time Series (accepted August 2007).
>>> * Floating Point Utilities (accepted March 2008).
>>
>> I guess the authors and the RMs of these two libraries have forgotten these libraries were accepted.
>> Time Series Eric Niebler John R. Phillips
>
> Not forgotten. I've announced publicly on this list that the review
> feedback was overwhelming and raised open-ended design issues that I
> probably wouldn't have the resources to address. IIRC, John Phillips
> took up the mantle, but I haven't heard anything further. I suppose that
> puts Time_series in the orphaned library catalog. It probably belongs
> back in the sandbox and should get another (mini?)review should it ever
> be completed.
>
>>> * Phoenix (accepted provisionally September 2008)
>>
>> Will we need to wait for a Phoenix that uses Proto?
>
> This is under active construction. As of BoostCon, we have a technical
> solution for the universal placeholders problem, and we're working on
> the extensibility hooks now. Once we settle on those, the rest should
> come fairly quickly.
Thanks for the informations. Is there a place where all these informations can be associated to the state of an accepted library but not yet released, maybe the wiki?
Best,