Subject: Re: [boost] [parameter] arg_list.hpp depends on maybe.hpp
From: Frank Mori Hess (fmhess_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-24 23:22:07
On Monday 24 May 2010, David Abrahams wrote:
>
> Sorry, but what am I supposed to do with a test that will fail even
> after the patch? Is the test broken, the patch broken, or something
> else?
I think the patch is broken and the test is valid. I couldn't tell you
exactly what practical difference it would make that the function type is
changed into a reference to function type, but it seems wrong that the
type is not exactly preserved.