Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] Formal Review: Boost.Move
From: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. (jhellrung_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-22 17:21:26
On 5/22/2010 1:14 PM, Terry Golubiewski wrote:
> * class rv: I needed the destructor to be public to compile
> for Microsoft VC2008.
I never had any problems with the current definition of boost::rv on
MSVC9. No instances of rv<T> should ever be created, only references.
Do you remember the context where you needed rv<T> to have a public
destructor???
- Jeff