Subject: Re: [boost] [tokenmap] updated perfect hash container in sandbox
From: Slawomir Lisznianski (sl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-04-24 09:46:40
Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
> If there is no reason that performance cannot be compared to
> boost::unordered_map, then please also perform this comparison.
will do..
> Consider also to reorder your template arguments to make the interface
> as close to normal maps as possible.
The intention was that the token-type, being limited to an integral
type, would default to an int which would work for vast majority of
cases. So the user could simply write:
tokenmap<my_class> fast_map;
instead of:
tokenmap<int, my_class> fast_map;
The second may give an impression that the key can be anything other,
whereas in reality it's quite limiting.
I don't feel strong about either method though.
-sl