Subject: Re: [boost] decltype and incomplete types
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-04-08 14:44:17
On 8 April 2010 19:18, Eric Niebler <eric_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Now, I'd like to re-raise the issue of commenting out for now the
> decltype-based implementation of result_of both on trunk and release. This
> is time-critical and a blocker for proto, xpressive and spirit on msvc-10,
> gcc in c++0x mode, and any other compiler that implements decltype. Let's do
> it on trunk, see what breaks (nothing, I hope) and try to get it in 1.43. We
> can always revert later.
The decltype implementation was only recently merged to release, we
can just revert the merge.
Daniel