Subject: Re: [boost] Stability: More on 3 level Boost libraries
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-27 10:34:05
On 27 March 2010 13:43, Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Your original argument was
> that there will be no volunteers for reaching the "stable" status of their
> libraries. I gave you the reason. Am I missing something?
You gave two reasons. I'm not convinced that either of them are true.
I really don't see how this proposal will make any difference to the
quality of boost. What I think might be useful would be a simple
guideline on how to make interface changes and deprecate old
interfaces. But I'll shut up now as this is going nowhere, maybe
you'll prove me wrong.
Daniel