Subject: Re: [boost] Library dependencies and intrer-library code reuse
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-26 06:30:51
On 26 March 2010 08:11, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Untangling (and minimizing) intra-library dependencies is certainly
> doable—the untangling part has already been done
> (http://gitorious.org/boost)—but you proposed something more radical…
> and probably impossible when you consider the pimpl/header-only
> requirement. A pimpl-based type traits library?
I don't think it's a good idea to divide boost up based on the current
directory structure. We really should sort out the structure of boost
before splitting it up, not after.
Daniel